March 2009. Volume 5. Number 1

Diseño y evaluación de Reglas de Predicción Clínica

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Rating: 0 (0 Votes)
Newsletter Free Subscription
Regularly recieve most recent articles by e-mail
Subscribe
Print
Add to library
Discuss this article

MBE | Bases of evidence based medicine

Author: Ochoa Sangrador C1.
1Servicio de Pediatría. Hospital Virgen de la Concha. Zamora. España.
Correspondence: Carlos Ochoa Sangrador. Email: cochoas@meditex.es
Reception date: 18/02/2009
Acceptance date: 24/02/2009
Publication date: 26/02/2009

How to cite this article

Ochoa Sangrador C. Diseño y evaluación de Reglas de Predicción Clínica. Evid Pediatr. 2009;5:28.

MBE | Bases of evidence based medicine

Author: Ochoa Sangrador C1.
1Servicio de Pediatría. Hospital Virgen de la Concha. Zamora. España.
Correspondence: Carlos Ochoa Sangrador. Email: cochoas@meditex.es
Reception date: 18/02/2009
Acceptance date: 24/02/2009
Publication date: 26/02/2009

How to cite this article

Ochoa Sangrador C. Diseño y evaluación de Reglas de Predicción Clínica. Evid Pediatr. 2009;5:28.

References

  1. Shaikh N, Morone NE, Lopez J, Chianese J, Sangvai S, D'Amico F, et al. Does this child have a urinary tract infection? JAMA. 2007;298:2895-904.
  2. Laupacis A, Sekar N, Stiell IG. Clinical prediction rules: a review and suggested modifications of methodological standards. JAMA. 1997;277:488-94.
  3. McGinn TG, Guyatt GH, Wyer PC, Naylor CD, Stiell IG, Richardson WS. Users’ guides to the medical literature, XXII: how to use articles about clinical decision rules: Evidence-Based Medicine Working Group. JAMA. 2000;284:79-84.
  4. Alvarado A. A practical score for the early diagnosis of acute apendicitis. Ann Emerg Med. 1986;15:557-64.
  5. Contessoto Spadetto C, Cámara Simón M, Avilés Inglés MJ, Ojeda Escuriet JM, Cascales Barceló I, Rodríguez Sánchez F. Empleo racional de los antibióticos en pediatría: impacto de la aplicación de un test rápido de detección de estreptococo beta-hemolítico del grupo A en la faringoamigdalitis aguda. An Esp Pediatr. 2000;52:212-9.
  6. Concato J, Feinstein AR, Holford TR. The risk of determining risk with multivariable models. Ann Intern Med. 1993;118:201-10.
  7. Ochoa Sangrador C, Orejas G. Epidemiología y metodología científica aplicada a la pediatría (IV): Pruebas diagnósticas. An Esp Pediatr. 1999;50:301-14.
  8. Wasson JH, Sox HC, Neff RK, Goldman L. Clinical prediction rules: application and methodological standards. N Engl J Med. 1985;313:793-9.
  9. Kharbanda AB, Taylor GA, Fishman SJ, Bachur RG. A clinical decision rule to identify children at low risk for appendicitis. Pediatrics. 2005;116;709-16.
  10. Toll D, Janssen K, Vergouwe Y, Moons K. Validation, updating and impact of clinical prediction rules: A review. J Clin Epidemiol. 2008;61:1085-94.
  11. Reilly BM, Evans AT. Translating clinical research into clinical practice: impact of using prediction rules to make decisions. Ann Intern Med. 2006;144:201-9.
  12. Stiell IG, McKnight RD, Greenberg GH, McDowell I, Nair RC, Wells GA, et al. Implementation of the Ottawa ankle rules. JAMA. 1994;271:827-32.
  13. Lucchesi GM, Jackson RE, Peacock WF, Cerasani C, Swor RA. Sensitivity of the Ottawa rules. Ann Emerg Med. 1995;26:1-5.
  14. Verma S, Hamilton K, Hawkins HH, Kothari R, Singal B, Buncher R, et al. Clinical application of the Ottawa ankle rules for the use of radiography in acute ankle injuries: an independent site assessment. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1997;169:825-7.
  15. Brehaut JC, Stiell IG, Visentin L, Graham ID. Clinical decision rules "in the real world": how a widely disseminated rule is used in everyday practice. Acad Emerg Med. 2005;12 948-56.
26/02/2009

Linked Comment